{"id":171,"date":"2019-08-19T06:32:47","date_gmt":"2019-08-19T06:32:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/?p=171"},"modified":"2019-08-29T04:56:56","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T04:56:56","slug":"words-words-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/2019\/08\/19\/words-words-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Words, Words, Words"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-drop-cap wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s never surprising that when doing online research, I\nwill find myself tumbling into internet rabbit holes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I\u2019ve been reading up on <em>The Man Who Came to Dinner<\/em> by Kaufman &amp; Hart after watching the movie with Bette Davis. There\u2019s a scene part way through where Davis\u2019 character loses a gambit to save her lover from the conniving movie star played by Ann Sheridan. Davis has almost no lines in the scene but you\u2019re very much aware of her presence and watch her reactions as her dreams fall apart. Under Sheridan\u2019s attack, Davis visibly shrinks in on herself. Her character knows she\u2019s beaten.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright is-resized\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Bette_Davis_in_Now_Voyager_trailer-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-172\" width=\"290\" height=\"253\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Bette_Davis_in_Now_Voyager_trailer-1.jpg 500w, http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Bette_Davis_in_Now_Voyager_trailer-1-300x262.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 290px) 85vw, 290px\" \/><figcaption>Image from Wikipedia<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I next started researching Davis and her work. This led me to reading Martin Shingler\u2019s article, \u201cBreathtaking: Bette Davis&#8217;s Performance at the End of <em>Now, Voyager<\/em>\u201d which discusses the melodrama inherent in her work. Then it occurred to me that I don\u2019t consider Davis\u2019 work to be melodrama. It\u2019s just, well, <strong>awesome<\/strong>. It\u2019s definitely a heightened reality but it is also a truthful performance which I felt exempted it from the melodrama category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the few contemporary performers that I\u2019ve seen capture that style of performance from Davis\u2019 hey day is the female impersonator, Charles Busch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The mellerdramas I\u2019ve watched were overblown for comic effect. I\u2019d read somewhere that Victorian performances weren\u2019t like that. Rather they were done earnestly and somewhere along the way the ironic detachment became the performance. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After citing several reviews of <em>Now, Voyager<\/em> Shingler broke down Davis\u2019 performance of that classic film:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-medium-brown-color wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The final scene from <\/em>Now, Voyager<em> reveals Davis to be in total command of her vocal technique and able to use it to tremendous effect. She seems to know exactly how to pitch her voice and how to vary volume and tempo in order to convey changes in the character&#8217;s mental and emotional state.<\/em> <br><br><em>It is a bravura display, as she glides through her character&#8217;s ever-changing thoughts and emotions, all subtly conveyed through the actress&#8217;s body and voice. One of the most remarkable aspects of this performance is the fact that the scene culminates in a line of dialogue that some consider one of the corniest in Hollywood history.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-medium-brown-color wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Yet the strength and subtlety of Davis&#8217;s performance makes it possible to accept the line when it comes as a truthful and heartfelt expression.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-medium-brown-color wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Remarkably, the infamous final line, &#8220;Oh Jerry, don&#8217;t let&#8217;s ask for the moon, we have the stars!&#8221; hardly feels like an aphorism at all. Somehow Bette Davis makes one of the great rhetorical flourishes of Hollywood melodrama seem real.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From here Shingler explores the nuances of Davis\u2019 work in creating that scene. Language is an everyday tool to make our way in the world that we give little thought to. But to truly focus on a section of text and really see how sentences are structured, the shape of chosen words, and how variations in pronouncing them can color the meaning of the message is sheer delight. It gives you an awareness of how flexible language is. It has a power to influence people\u2019s opinions or to get them to pass the salt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-medium-brown-color wp-block-paragraph\"><em>It is instructive to pause here and consider the kinds of critical decisions Bette Davis had to make in order to play this scene. For instance, she had to decide which lines and which words to emphasize. She had to consider how to vary the rhythm of her speeches using differences in pace, pitch, tone, and volume: for example, which words to whisper, which to project firmly or even loudly. She had to work out the best places to pause and decide in which pauses to breathe. She had to think about how much breath to use. She also needed to consider when to move, and, when speaking, where to look: up or down, at or away from her costar.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When my first play was being produced by classmates in college,\nwe engaged in similar work in the rehearsal process. There is never time to\nspare and yet Kimberly Bouchard, the director, chose to spend several of those\ndays on the opening monologue. She had the actor slow down her reading to the\npoint that each phoneme was isolated. Then she sped up, tasting the shape of\nsounds and how each was articulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is a Royal Shakespeare Company series led by John Barton that discusses close text analysis of Shakespeare\u2019s works. It was on You Tube last I\u2019d check and is fascinating to watch. Of course, it doesn\u2019t hurt that it is populated with RSC alumni that I\u2019m quite familiar with from film &amp; tv. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=105518406\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=105518406<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Diving in to savor the minutia of a script and pulling back\nto incorporate all the pieces into a performance never gets dull. There is a\nduality in it where one is immersed and beside a script at the same time. This\nidea is reflected in this final quote from Shingler quoting Davis\u2019 1962 autobiography.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-medium-brown-color wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2026. Davis wrote: With young actors who talk about becoming the character and losing themselves in a role, I must argue. There is a part of you that must hold the reins and control the projection. There is a part of you that must be aware of pace and timing. Without discipline and detachment, an actor is an emotional slob, spilling his insides. This abandonment is having an unfortunate vogue. It is tasteless, formless, absurd. Without containment there is no art.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And it occurs to me that <em>This Random World<\/em> also deals with containers\u2026 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Shingler, Maring. &#8220;Breathtaking: Bette Davis&#8217;s Performance at the End of <em>Now, Voyager<\/em>.&#8221;<em> Journal of Film and Video<\/em>, Vol. 58, No. 1\/2 (Spring\/Summer 2006)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s never surprising that when doing online research, I will find myself tumbling into internet rabbit holes. I\u2019ve been reading up on The Man Who Came to Dinner by Kaufman &amp; Hart after watching the movie with Bette Davis. There\u2019s a scene part way through where Davis\u2019 character loses a gambit to save her lover &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/2019\/08\/19\/words-words-words\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Words, Words, Words&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,7,11],"tags":[10,29,13],"class_list":["post-171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dramaturg","category-playwright","category-theatre","tag-dlpanotherfinemess","tag-lovemesomeresearch","tag-theatre"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":182,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171\/revisions\/182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.nwhellcats.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}